The Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan (Habitat Plan) is both a habitat conservation plan and natural community conservation plan, or HCP/NCCP. This planning document:
The Habitat Plan was prepared by six local agencies:
An HCP is a document that meets federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) requirements and enables local agencies to allow projects and activities to occur in endangered species’ habitats. In exchange, those projects and activities must incorporate HCP-prescribed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for adverse effects on natural communities and endangered species.
An HCP extends its federally granted endangered species permit—or its take authorization—to all projects and activities it covers. Loosely defined, take means to injure or kill a listed species or alter the habitat on which it depends. (For more information on take, see Question 6 below.) Although the ESA prohibits take of listed species, under some circumstances take can be authorized by permit to agencies, developers, and other entities engaged in otherwise lawful activities. The HCP process recognizes the impact of land use activities and establishes a program to provide for a net benefit to specific species.
Without a regional HCP in place, local governments, private entities, or individuals evaluate projects and activities individually in consultation with a variety of federal and state regulators to mitigate for potential impacts on species. This is a lengthy process that can cost all parties considerable time and money. This approach also does less to protect wildlife because project- or activity-specific mitigation measures result in land being set aside on a piecemeal basis, resulting in fragmented habitats that are less ecologically viable and also more difficult to manage. Regional HCPs are a relatively new tool for protecting endangered and threatened species and represent an important integration of land use planning, regional and interagency coordination, and habitat conservation. The Habitat Plan offers a more efficient process for protecting the environment and processing applications for local projects and activities that may affect endangered species.
A natural community conservation plan (NCCP) is the state counterpart to the federal HCP. It provides a means of complying with the Natural Community Conservation Planning Act (NCCP Act) and securing take authorization at the State level. The NCCP Act is broader than ESA and the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). The primary objective of the NCCP program is to conserve natural communities at the ecosystem scale while accommodating compatible land uses. To be approved by CDFW, an NCCP must provide for the conservation of species and protection and management of natural communities in perpetuity within the area covered by permits.
NCCPs are different from HCPs because the NCCP Act requires that conservation actions improve the overall condition of a species, whereas an HCP typically only requires avoidance of a net adverse impact on a species. And while an HCP can be applied at a project-by-project or regional scale, an NCCP must be applied at the regional scale to promote the long-term recovery of species, protection of habitat and natural communities, and diversity of species at the landscape-level. Thus the state requirements go “above and beyond” the federal mitigation requirements.
Local agencies often choose to prepare a joint HCP/NCCP because the requirements of both documents are similar and because coverage is desired for both federally and state-listed species.
"Take," as defined by ESA, means "to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct." Harm is defined as "any act that kills or injures the species, including significant habitat modification or degradation where it actually kills or injures wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding, or sheltering" (50 CFR 17.3).
At the state level, take is defined under the California Fish and Game Code (more narrowly than under ESA) as any action or attempt to "hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill."
For landowners wishing to develop land, the Habitat Plan streamlines the permitting process by pre-identifying mitigation obligations for impacts on species habitat, including aquatic land covers (e.g., wetlands and streams), and providing a process to meet mitigation obligations. In this manner, the Habitat Plan allows landowners seeking endangered species permits to pursue their projects with increased certainty of project timelines and associated costs.
For developers, the Habitat Plan offers a streamlined permitting process for planned development, infrastructure, and maintenance activities. Applications for endangered species permits can occur in tandem with other building permits because the Habitat Plan allows local agencies—specifically, the County and the Cities of Gilroy, Morgan Hill, and San José—to grant endangered species permits to projects and activities under their jurisdictions.
Importantly, the Habitat Plan benefits the environment by protecting, enhancing, and restoring natural resources in specific areas of Santa Clara County and contributing to the recovery of threatened and endangered species. Instead of evaluating and permitting projects and activities individually, which can result in piecemeal and disjointed conservation efforts, the Habitat Plan enables evaluation of natural resource impacts and mitigation requirements comprehensively. This method is more efficient and effective for at-risk species and their habitats. At full plan implementation, the Reserve System will protect an estimated 46,920 acres for the benefit of covered species, natural communities, biological diversity, and ecosystem function.
Projects are well-defined actions that occur once in a discrete location (e.g., building a house). By contrast, activities are actions that occur repeatedly in one or more locations (e.g., vegetation management along roads and streams). Together, these activities and projects are the covered activities for which endangered species permits from the Wildlife Agencies will be obtained. Covered activities under the Habitat Plan include all types of private development and public projects so long as certain criteria are met.
All covered activities must incorporate the relevant conditions on covered activities described in Chapter 6 of the Habitat Plan to avoid or minimize impacts on covered species and natural communities.
Numerous projects and activities cannot seek coverage under the Habitat Plan. These include:
The Habitat Plan permit term is 50 years, although lands conserved under the Habitat Plan will be permanently protected. This Reserve System will protect an estimated 46,920 acres for the benefit of covered species, natural communities, biological diversity, and ecosystem function.
Management of the Reserve System in perpetuity will be ensured through the conservation easement or title record. While managed in perpetuity, all land acquisitions for the Reserve System will be acquired by year 45 of the permit term. In addition, the Habitat Plan will create an endowment during the permit term to fund all needed implementation after the permit term. An endowment of $90 million in current dollars is needed to generate average annual real returns of $3.5 million to fund post-permit term management and monitoring of the Reserve System.
The Habitat Plan covers approximately 510,000 acres, primarily within south Santa Clara County. This permit area covers land from the Santa Clara / Alameda County border south to the Santa Clara/ San Benito County border and from the western edge of San José east to the eastern edge of the Coyote Creek watershed or the County boundary.
The boundaries are based on political, ecological, and hydrologic factors, as well as the location of covered activities and conservation activities. The permit area includes all of the Lagas / Uvas / Pacheco watersheds within Santa Clara County and all of the Coyote Creek watershed except for the Baylands. A large portion of the Guadalupe watershed is also within the permit area.
A small portion of the northern edge of the County (portions of the cities of San José, Santa Clara, Mountain View, Milpitas, Sunnyvale), Fremont in Alameda County, and a small portion of San Mateo County are included for the implementation of conservation action for western burrowing owl.
The Habitat Plan is not a land use plan and does not change or amend any local jurisdiction’s policies regarding zoning or allowable growth.
The Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency (Habitat Agency) is the agency primarily responsible for executing the requirements of the Habitat Plan, the federal and State endangered species permits, and the Implementing Agreement (the legal document between the Wildlife Agencies and co-Permittees to implement the Plan). The county and three cities are responsible for Plan compliance with respect to private development projects in their jurisdictions, and each co-Permittee is responsible for ensuring its own public projects are carried out in conformance with the Plan. The Habitat Agency will hold title to lands or easements it purchases and oversee cooperative agreements with land management entities that own and/or manage reserves as part of the Reserve System. The Habitat Agency may also provide funding to local land trusts and management agencies for them to purchase land for the Reserve System. The Habitat Agency will provide funds for reserve management and monitoring to those agencies and organizations with whom it contracts for such services.
The Habitat Agency is a joint powers authority (JPA) composed of the Cities of Gilroy, Morgan Hill, and San José, and the county. The JPA is limited to the four participating jurisdictions because the Joint Exercise of Powers Act requires that a JPA can only exercise powers held by all the participating agencies—and of the six participating agencies, only the four jurisdictions have the authority to adopt the Habitat Plan development fees. However, because all six agencies are responsible for implementing the Habitat Plan, each has a role in the Habitat Agency.
The Habitat Agency has two decision-making bodies, a Governing Board and an Implementation Board. Currently information on the Governing Board and Implementation Board can be found online; however, a new website is under development for the Habitat Agency. The Habitat Agency has joined the six other local agencies as a co-Permittee on the state and federal permits.